reading comprehension assignment
Abstractive Method
The Washington, D.C. office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, against Ford Motor Company. The complaint, filed in December 2016, alleged race discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that Defendant LJAC’s apprenticeship test had a disparate impact on African-American apprenticeship applicants and consequently denied them eligibility and admission to the apprenticeship program. The charging parties intervened in the suit in January 2017. The parties settled the lawsuit in February 2017 through a consent decree. The consent decree included non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses, required Defendant to provide the charging parties with neutral references, expungement of their employment records, and costs of the settlement. The docket sheet does not show any further enforcement took place; the case was presumably closed in 2018.
Extractive Method
5. At all relevant times, Defendant Employer has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(b), (g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.
7. At all relevant times, Defendant UAW has continuously been a labor organization engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(d) and (e) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.
9. At all relevant times, labor organization engaged in an Defendant UAW Local 863 has continuously been a industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(d) and (e) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.
Rinfro, Eric Barbee and Darnay Cheeks filed charges with the Commission alleging violations of Title VII by Defendant Employer.
Since at least January 1,1997, Defendant Employer has engaged in unlawful employment practices at its Sharonville and former Batavia, Ohio facilities, in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.
The Commission alleges that Defendant Employer’s apprenticeship test has a disparate impact on African-American apprentice applicants and consequently denies them eligibility and admission to the apprenticeship program.
Since at least January 1, 1997, Defendant UAW has engaged in unlawful employment practices at Defendant Employer’s Sharonville and former Batavia, Ohio facilities, in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.
The Commission alleges that Defendant UAW’s apprenticeship test has a disparate impact on African-American apprentice applicants and consequently denies them eligibility and admission to the apprenticeship program.
Since at least January 1, 1997, Defendant UAW Local 863 has engaged in unlawful employment practices at Defendant Employer’s Sharonville and former Batavia, Ohio facilities, in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.
The Commission alleges that Defendant UAW Local 863’s apprenticeship test has a disparate impact on African-American apprentice applicants and consequently denies them eligibility and admission to the apprenticeship program.
Since at least January 1, 1997, Defendant UAW NJAC has engaged in unlawful employment practices at Defendant Employer’s Sharonville and former Batavia, Ohio facilities, in violation of Section 703(a) of Tit~e VII, 42 U.S.C.
The Commission alleges that Defendant NJAC’s apprenticeship test has a disparate impact on African-American apprentice applicants and consequently denies them eligibility and admission to the apprenticeship program.
Since at least January 1, 1997, Defendant LJAC has engaged in unlawful employment practices at Defendant Employer’s Sharonville and former Batavia, Ohio facilities, in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.
The Commission alleges that Defendant LJAC’s apprenticeship test has a disparate impact on African-American apprentice applicants and consequently denies them eligibility and admission to the apprenticeship program.
Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant Employer, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in disparate impact regarding selection for apprenticeship and any other employment practice which discriminates on the basis of race.
B. Order Defendant Employer to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities forAfrican-Americans, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices.
Rinfro, Eric Barbee, Darnay Cheeks and other similarly situated African-American individuals by providing appropriate backpay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices, including rightful-place instatement and front pay.
D. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant UAW, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging 8 in disparate impact regarding selection for apprenticeship and any other employment practice which discriminates on the basis of race.
E. Order Defendant UAW to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities forAfdcan-Americans, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices.
G. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant UAW Local 863, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in disparate impact regarding selection for apprenticeship and any other employment practice which discriminates on the basis of race.
H. Order Defendant UAW Local 863 to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for African-Americans, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices.
J. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant UAW Local 863, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in disparate impact regarding selection for apprenticeship and any other employment practice which discriminates on the basis of race.
K. Order Defendant UAW Local 863 to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for African-Americans, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices.
M. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant NJAC, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in disparate impact regarding selection for apprenticeship and any other employment practice which discriminates on the basis of race.
Order Defendant NJAC to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for African-Americans, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices.
Rinfro and other similarly situated African-American individuals by providing appropriate backpay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices, including rightful-place instatement and front pay.
P. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant LJAC, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in disparate impact regarding selection for apprenticeship and any other employment practice which discriminates on the basis of race.
Q. Order Defendant LJAC to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities forAfdcan-Americans, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices.